• HARDWARE
  • SOFTWARE
  • REVIEWS
  • BUYING GUIDE
  • GAMING

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

We explain what this mysterious weapon is in the hands Ukrainians. We explain

May 23, 2022

Huawei announced that Leica had ended its cooperation. Xiaomi was now a partner in the German company.

May 23, 2022

Xbox gives up Spider-Man licensing, allowing PlayStation take back exclusivity

May 23, 2022
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Tech ArticaTech Artica
  • HARDWARE
  • SOFTWARE
  • REVIEWS
  • BUYING GUIDE
  • GAMING
Tech ArticaTech Artica
Home»LATEST NEWS»U.S. tech firms have asked the Supreme Court for a blockade of the Texas social media law. It prohibits users from posting political opinions.
LATEST NEWS

U.S. tech firms have asked the Supreme Court for a blockade of the Texas social media law. It prohibits users from posting political opinions.

techarticaBy techarticaMay 15, 2022Updated:May 15, 2022No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook WhatsApp Twitter Telegram Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Источник изображения: succo / pixabay.com
Share
Facebook WhatsApp Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Lobby groups representing Facebook’s interests*Twitter, Google, and other tech companies have made an urgent request to the US Supreme Court for a strike against a Texas law that bars major social media platforms blocking users based upon their political views.


The law was approved by the Fifth US Circuit Court of Appeals, which overturned an earlier blockade by a district court. The document states that social network companies with over 50 million users are not allowed to block them based on political views. It also requires that the public be made aware of how the platform administrations manage content.

Texas Governor Rick Perry signed the law. Greg Abbott, who is a Republican Party member, signed this law into law in September 2017. NetChoice and Computer and Communications Industry Association sued to block it. A preliminary injunction was issued by Robert Pitman, Austin District Judge. The judge said that the law violates the First Amendment’s constitutional right to free speech for social network administrators.

The urgent request was made to the U.S. Supreme Court by the authors “to allow the verified motivational part to remain in force [решения]District Court at time of appeal.

* It is now included in the list o public associations and religious organisations for whom the court has made a final determination to liquidate or ban all activities on the grounds provided by Federal Law No. 114-FZ of July 25, 2002 “On countering extremist activity”.

Share. Facebook Telegram Twitter WhatsApp Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit VKontakte
Previous ArticleVideo: The Cinematic Trailer for Apex Legends Season 2 with Newcastle, a New Legend
Next Article According to rumors, Elon Musk could announce the purchase of Twitter today.

Related Posts

We explain what this mysterious weapon is in the hands Ukrainians. We explain

May 23, 2022

Huawei announced that Leica had ended its cooperation. Xiaomi was now a partner in the German company.

May 23, 2022

Officially, Xiaomi and Leica collaborate. In the summer, we will see its fruits and it could be Xiaomi 12 Ultra

May 23, 2022

Motorola unveils a smartphone featuring a 200 MPix camera. When is the debut?

May 23, 2022

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Latest Posts

We explain what this mysterious weapon is in the hands Ukrainians. We explain

LATEST NEWS

Huawei announced that Leica had ended its cooperation. Xiaomi was now a partner in the German company.

LATEST NEWS

Xbox gives up Spider-Man licensing, allowing PlayStation take back exclusivity

GAMING
Advertisement
Tech Artica
Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Vimeo YouTube
  • Home
  • Buy Now
© 2022 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.